BAYREUTH 2003
We saw three productions at this year's festival, Claus Guth's staging of "The Flying Dutchman," conducted by Marc Albrecht, a new production and a great success; Philippe Arlaud's lame "Tannhäuser," conducted by Christian Thielemann; and Keith Warner's "Lohengrin," conducted by Sir Andrew Davis, which was a disaster. On the musical side, it must be said that even the latter two were satisfactory and sometimes excellent, and the audience rewarded all the singers will huge ovations (but who knows what the motive for that might be?). Below are some observations on the productions by Allen Frantzen and, at greater length, George Paterson's summary of "Lohengrin."

These images from the productions are linked in the narrative below:

Dutchman, Act 1 and Dutchman, Act 2
Tannhäuser, Act 2 and Tannhäuser, Act 3
Lohengrin, Act 3 scene 1 and Lohengrin, Act 3, scene 2
and Dutchman (1993).

Staging

The big thing in Bayreuth is stage machinery. Every production does some technical thing, if only one thing, amazingly well and no doubt at great expense. It is worth going there to see these devices in action, even if they are not always used well.

In "Dutchman" it was a staircase that had no visible support but held almost the entire chorus, about 100 singers (see photo below); this production also used video very cleverly. When the opera opens, for example, the storm at sea is projected onto the lower part of the set; soon the deep red curtain rises to reveal a perfect mirror of the world "below stairs," as it were (i.e., inverted). The staircase obviously was massively supported from behind the set wall; very impressive.

In "Tannhäuser" the big thing, used only once, alas, was an elevator that whisked the Venusberg scene up and back silently and swiftly. Venus was sitting or standing on the platform on which she and the hero argued, and when he finally rejected her the whole thing just vanished from sight, a brilliant effect, cinematic (one has to say it). Unfortunately the reappearance of Venus in Act 3 is accompanied by red light only, cheap.

In "Lohengrin" there two devices in control of the production. King Henry and his knights, usually on stage when the prodution begins, were here lowered by means of a vast elevator that reached from one end of the stage to another. When it was used again, in act 2, the two rows of gold-clad knights were accompanied by rows above them of dummy knights wearing the same gear, a powerful evocation of church architecture, e.g., an altarpiece. When Teleramund is killed (as George scornfully notes below) the stage platform tilts at a sharp angle and spills water into the hole the hero will later roll into. (Versions of the tilting platform and the elevator were both used in previous "Ring" productions.)

"Tannhäuser"
We thought that Arlaud's ideas for "Tannhäuser," insofar as the set expressed them, were trivial. You can see in Act 2, when the song contest has collapsed, that Elizabeth picks up a sword and uses it to protect the disgraced hero. There's a hint here of the big thing in opera produtions these days, which we will call "Frauenmacht," the 21st century's version of "all power to the people," in this case, "all power to the women." However, Elizabeth dutifully trails off to expire in Act 3, so at least the director stuck with the plot, and the final ensemble was gloriously sung over her corpse, surrounded with white flowers on a black bier. The set in Act 3 (also for Act 1, scene 2), is something like a tunnel or underpass (as George saw it), with grass and flowers inexplicably growing down from above as well as up from below. The point being--? Should it look like a vortex, or what? One merit of the design, which is otherwise mysterious, is that it reflects the staging method of early Bayreuth productions, which arranged flats of scenery in seven receeding rows or "alleys" parallel to the curtain. These "alleys" correspond to the 7 divisions used to mark the gradual narrowing of the house from the back boxes to the stage. Perspective was important to the design of the house, and this production at least nodded to that tradition in its sets.

"Lohengrin"
This was the most objectionable of the three we saw. It introduced extraneous characters and deliberately set stage action against the libretto; it also failed to deliver any visual punch for any--any--of the opera's most dramatically and musically exciting moments and was generally mired in conceptual murk from beginning to end.

George's summary:

Overture:
During the overture, three vignettes appear murkily behind a scrim:

1) In a square box high above the stage, hands do something with candles (in the gloom, we can't be sure what it is).
2) At middle height, against a round moonlike circle, someone's silhouette is seen for quite a while, until he slowly wanders off.
3) At ground level, a swan rises to the surface of a small pool, puddle, or sinkhole, then sinks again. [AJF: the swan looked like an ice carving, a little like what you'd find in a Las Vegas wedding reception.]

Act I:
Elsa's normally dramatic entrance when summoned by the king is vitiated by the fact that the director has her already onstage as part of the general crowd. As she sings her opening aria ("Elsa's Dream") a shield and sword rise from the sinkhole, then sink again. Does anybody else see them? The approach of Lohengrin is heralded by the chorus as they marvel at the swan-drawn boat they see approaching. This is represented onstage by the lowering of a box high overhead, in which a person can be seen briefly thrashing around until the box is hauled back up to the flies. A curtain [AJF: a big box, actually, that cracks open, then closes; it was embarrassing to see the chours peering into this hole, getting more and more excited by something they couldn't see; delusional?] splits at the back of the stage letting very bright, white, light spill out--in a most un-magical way. The assembled nobles face the back of the stage and we hear Lohengrin's voice in his opening aria, but we can't tell where he is. Finally one of the crowd turns to face us, as we see that he is Lohengrin. For the duel between Lohengrin and Telramund, a screen of bedsheets is erected, thus saving the cost of a fencing coach for the singers. When the sheets come down, Telramund is on the ground, defeated.

Act II:
Wagner sets the first scene outside the fortress of Antwerp and calls for the banished Ortrud and Telramund to be alone onstage. Our director prefers to set the scene in a desert ditch above which a segment of highway seems to rest. In this desert, Ortrud and Telramund light a campfire and recline on upholstered furniture beside a round, carved table with decanter. They are not alone. Unidentified persons encircle Telramund and wave their hands over his head for a while before wandering off. [AJF: One of them is cutting his hair, I think, punishment? banishment? shame?] Up on the highway, Elsa and Lohengrin sit motionless in chairs facing one another, but separated by a screen. [AJF: They were covered by the big box mentioned above, which is lifted up to reveal them sitting on opposite sides of the screen, which obviously represents the "secret" between them.] As the act progresses, Wagner has the unsuspecting Elsa appear at her window, respond to the scheming Ortrud's blandishments, and come down to admit Ortrud into the women's quarters. ("Thus does mischief enter this house!") In this version, the highway segment rotates until Lohengrin is out of sight behind the screen (which then collapses). Elsa comes down from the highway for her scene with Ortrud, but at its end they leave the stage in opposite directions, pausing for a long moment to point at each other. (Thus no mischief enters any house--except the mischief of the director in the Festival house.)

For the procession to the minster, the highway segment becomes a tilted platform with little pull-out trays on each side where individual cast members can stand at key moments. Elsa is flat out on the platform, encircled by a spiralling white train, as the lights come up. [AJF: She has obviously slept through her alarm on her wedding day, a pretty ditsy touch in a "Frauenmacht" production like this one.] A drawbridge descends stage right, permitting access to the platform where Elsa is lying. A double row of bridesmaids walks up the sloping bridge to Elsa, who now stands, and they hold her long train over their heads. Ortrud, disguised in Telramund's coat, strides between the two rows of women, underneath the train, until she reaches Elsa, casts off her husband's coat, and begins the great confrontation scene. The King, Elsa, Lohengrin, and Telramund take their places on their little slide-out trays. No one moves to restrain the terrible behavior of Telramund and Ortrud, so apparently their banishment under threat of death has slipped everyone's mind. As the act reaches its climax, a second drawbridge descends stage left, connecting the platform to the stage wings. The procession can now leave the platform and continue its upward progress. But it doesn't. Everybody just stays where they are. Big waste of drawbridge. [AJF: Big waste of magnificent processional music, too, roaring away as the characters stand still.]

Act III:
The bridal chamber is the platform, now level, and furnished with a black leather chaise and a small chair. It rotates continuously during the scene. A procession of about a dozen bridesmaids enters stage left with folded white cloths over outstretched arms. They line up across the front of the stage, face the audience, unfold their cloths, and spread them on the ground like beach towels. Black-clad knights enter stage right, line up facing the bridesmaids, and place their swords on the beachtowels. The maids wrap the swords individually and leave the wrapped swords lying across the front of the stage for the rest of the act.

Telramund, Ortrud, and the Four Nobles lurk in the culvert below, as Elsa and Lohengrin have their great scene in which she asks the fatal question. Gradually the Act I sinkhole reappears downstage. As things begin to go bad, Elsa leaves the platform, rushes to the front of the stage and frantically begins gathering up all the wrapped swords until her arms are completely full of swords. (Good thing they're Mylar stage props, or she'd never be able to hold them all--not to mention the cuts!) The purpose of this is so that she can then drop them again, which she proceeds to do. When Telramund rushes Lohengrin and is slain by him, the platorm suddenly lurches into a steep tilt, and several gallons of water spill out of it into the sinkhole.
As the final scene opens, a large number of black-clad soldiers engage in swordfighting. (No explanation for this in the libretto.) In the final scene, the King has become unaccountably enfeebled, unable even to lift his sword, although he was hale and hearty up to now. Allen tells me he also collapses and dies. (I missed that, as the stage was extremely murky; also the king was far right and upstage.) Lohengrin explains his identity and that he must return to his native land. The swan is supposed to reappear now, but in this version, an unidentified child comes in carrying a dead swan ("Parsifal," anyone?). This dead swan is NOT transformed into Gottfried. At some point, four children come rushing down from the hillside and flatten themselves on the stage. Adult persons wave their hands over the children's heads for a while. Lohengrin approaches one of them, saying "See here the Duke of Brabant!" But this child shakes his head and indicates that it's not him but one of the other kids who is Gottfried. So Lohengrin gives that kid his sword. Then, instead of leaving in a dove-drawn boat, as per Wagner, he lies down and rolls into the sinkhole. Elsa does not sink lifeless to the ground. Instead, she joins hands with her tormentor, Ortrud, and gazes up at her smiling. Curtain.

[AJF: Wild cheers followed for the "Frauenmacht" production. My analysis follows:

This opera is an allegory about men and women, nothing more, conflated with an allegory about religious bigotry. Ortrud, who represents "native" or "folk" paganism, must have got a raw deal when her creed was replaced by Christianity. This is a point of view that any self-respecting theater director or college professor will support today. Elsa, supposedy the heroine, is the flower of the new faith and the victim of Ortrud's malice; but Elsa gets unfair help from the Christian God when she is put on trial for killing her brother--Ortrud's scheme, of course, but let's not hold it against Ortrud, who finds a woman's life difficult out there in Brabant.
But this mysterious God-sent knight won't say who he is; thus Elsa too gets a raw deal too, victim of a power play by the man who was supposed to save her. Her supposed "rescue" is just another form of oppression. So it is easy to see, professor- or director-wise, that Elsa and Ortrud have more in common than, say, Elsa and Lohengrin. George did not note that unlike Elsa and her man, Ortrud and her man actually dabble in sex on stage, this being Ortrud's weapon over Telramund. (People who have sex are better than people who don't, since in professor- or director-land nothing is more middle class and outré than being "sex-negative.") As to the nobles, in the end King Henry is just another feeble male, unable to resist the rising women. Lohengrin can't defeat Ortrud, which leads to his shameful, cowardly exit as he rolls into the hole he supposedly came out of (but he didn't; he came down from heaven in a box, presumably dangling from a stork's jaw, but I couldn't see it). The new king, the boy, will be even easier to manage than the old one, and when he grow up he certainly won't try to keep any secrets from the ladies. End of heroic masculinity, end of story.]

Ticketing

In case you are wondering, we have ordered tickets to the festival every year since 1983 (friends in Germany gave us tickets to "Parsival" in 1982, so we have been there four times). In 1987 we received tickets to "Lohengrin" (Werner Herzog's exciting production was new that year), "Tannhäser," and "Meistersinger," the latter two pretty flat. In 1993 we receive ticketse to Dieter Dorn's sensational "Dutchman," the same "Lohengrin," which we were delighted to see again, and "Parsifal," unremarkable visually but featuring Placido Domingo--a rare first-rate star in a Bayreuth cast. Our tickets in row 19 cost about $165 and were closer to the center than to the sides. The sound was marvelous and most of the time there was little or no stage noise; perhaps the banging away in Act 2, scene 2, was supposed to wake up Elsa, but somebody should bang away and wake up the Festival director.